TWO-YEAR LIMITATIONS PERIOD TO FILE CLAIM BEGAN TO RUN ON DATE OF FIRE

131_C133

TWO-YEAR LIMITATIONS PERIOD TO FILE CLAIM BEGAN TO RUN ON DATE OF FIRE

Commercial Property

Subrogation

Faulty Wiring

Two-Year Limitation

 

A fire damaged property owned by Metamorphosis Salon (Salon) insured by United Fire Group (United) on March 6, 2006. Neither Salon nor United knew what caused the fire. On March 27, 2006, a fire investigator informed United that faulty wiring in an electrical exit sign caused the fire. Powers Electric, Inc. (Powers) had installed the exit sign. United made a series of payments to Salon to compensate it for its losses. Salon cashed the payments between April 24 and August 7, 2006.

 

United filed a subrogation claim against Powers on March 11, 2008, claiming that Powers negligently installed the exit sign and that this negligence caused the fire. Powers moved for summary judgment, stating that United was barred because it was not filed within the applicable statute of limitations. Powers argued that the statute began to run on the date of the fire. United countered, arguing that it began to run either on the date it received the fire investigator's report that determined the cause or the dates that Salon cashed the insurance payments. The trial court granted Powers' motion for summary judgment, agreeing that the statute of limitations began to run on the date of the fire and that United was barred because it did not file its subrogation claim until more than two years after the date. United appealed.

 

The Colorado Court of Appeals determined that the fire that damaged Salon's premises was the "physical manifestation of the defect" in Powers' installation of the exit sign that had faulty wiring. For the purposes of pinpointing the two-year statute of limitations that applied to United's subrogation claim against Powers based on its alleged negligent installation, the limitations period began to run on the date of the fire, not on the date of the fire investigator's report or when Salon cashed the checks. It held that the fire was a natural and material thing that was the perceptible, outward, and visible expression of defective wiring in the exit sign. In other words, the damage served as the initial discovery of the defect and United stepped into Salon's shoes to recover its losses and was required to use Salon's accrual date, being the date of the fire.

 

The appellate court upheld the trial court's decision.

 

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. VII. United Fire Group, as subrogee of Metamorphosis Salon, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Powers Electric, Inc. and Gary J. Powers d/b/a Powers Electric, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 09CA1869. June 24, 2010. 240 P.3d 569